<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="0.92"
        xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
        xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
        xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
        <title>deep darc » Google Talk</title>
        <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/category/google-talk/</link>
        <description>deep and darc stuff</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:45:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
        <language>en</language>

                
        <item>
            <title>Honeymoon is over</title>
            <dc:creator>darco</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2006/10/27/honeymoon-is-over/</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I don't want to seem unappreciative, so I'll start out with some good points. <a href="http://www.google.com/talk/">Google Talk</a> has energized <a href="http://www.jabber.org/">Jabber</a>/<a href="http://www.xmpp.org/">XMPP</a> to a level of activity that is unprecedented. Think about all of the things that have happened since Google Talk went beta: how much of it is a direct or indirect result of Google choosing to use XMPP as the protocol for their IM service? I don't want to minimize this point. Google Talk has been one of the best things to happen to the Jabber community in recent memory. And kudos to them.</p>

<p>Ever since Google Talk <a href="http://googletalk.blogspot.com/2006/01/xmpp-federation.html">flipped the switch</a> to enable server-to-server communications, Google Talk has become <a href="http://www.deepdarc.com/2006/05/19/full-time-jabber/#use-jabber">my default recommendation</a> for anyone looking to get a ‘jabber account’. Back then, <a href="http://www.jabber.org/">jabber.org</a> was still having stability problems (as it was still running <a href="http://jabberd.jabberstudio.org/1.4/">jabberd 1.4</a>), and <a href="http://jabber.deepdarc.com/">my own server</a> was also less than reliable. Google Talk also came with several useful features, such as the <a href="http://www.google.com/talk/about.html#withgmail">chat client built right into gmail</a>.</p>

<p>However, I have recently realized that Google Talk is not the ideal, stable jabber server that I thought it would be. Read on to find out why.</p>

<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> (2006-11-01) <a href="http://googletalk.blogspot.com/2006/11/offline-messages.html">Google Talk now supports offline message delivery</a>!</p>

<div><a href="http://www.deepdarc.com/2006/10/27/honeymoon-is-over/">Read the rest of this entry &raquo;</a></div>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 01:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>Google Talk Supports vCard Avatars</title>
            <dc:creator>darco</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2006/03/31/google-talk-vcard-avatars/</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I just noticed yesterday that Google Talk now seems to support <a href="http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0153.html">vCard avatars</a>! Apparently, they support pretty much nothing else about <a href="http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0054.html">vcard-temp</a>... but hey, at least I no longer have to keep explaining to my friends why their avatars don't work with their gmail accounts. <img src="http://www.deepdarc.com//images/smilies/1.png" alt=":)" style="border: 0; margin-bottom: -4px;" /></p>

<p>Just a reminder to everyone: I'll be <a href="http://www.deepdarc.com/2006/02/27/goodbye-legacy-im/">dropping my accounts</a> on AIM, MSN, ICQ, and YIM on May 19<sup>th</sup> of this year, and switching entirely to Jabber. So grab yourself a gmail account if you don't already have a jabber account!</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>Google Talk Federates!</title>
            <dc:creator>darco</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2006/01/17/google-talk-federates/</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ralphm.net/blog/2006/01/17/gtalk_s2s">It would appear</a> that <a href="http://talk.google.com/">Google Talk</a> has has not only <a href="http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/archives/2006/01/telnet_federati.html">begun testing Server-to-Server communication</a> with the <code><a href="xmpp:google.com">google.com</a></code> domain, but also <a href="http://www.deepdarc.com/2006/01/17/google-talk-federates/#comment-266">enabled S2S communication</a> for <code><a href="xmpp:gmail.com">gmail.com</a></code>! This should be the major turning point for <a href="http://www.jabber.org">Jabber</a> adoption. It's time to take over the world. <img src="http://www.deepdarc.com//images/smilies/7.png" alt=":D" style="border: 0; margin-bottom: -4px;" /></p>

<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: <a href="http://googletalk.blogspot.com/2006/01/xmpp-federation.html">Official Announcement</a> | <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/google-talk-open">Official Discussion Forum</a></p>

<div><a href="http://www.deepdarc.com/2006/01/17/google-talk-federates/">Read the rest of this entry &raquo;</a></div>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
</channel>
</rss>
