<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="0.92"
        xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
        xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
        xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
        <title>deep darc » Comments</title>
        <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/</link>
        <description>deep and darc stuff</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 03:34:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
        <language>en</language>

                
        <item>
            <title>RE: New Look</title>
            <dc:creator>darco</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2005/10/09/new-look/#comment-829</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>temporary comment, just testing</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 03:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Jabber Bots</title>
            <dc:creator>Siddharth</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2005/06/12/jabber-bots/#comment-828</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I also want to host a jabber bot. Where do you host your jabber bot?</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Mobile XMPP</title>
            <dc:creator>D. A.</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2008/02/14/mobile-xmpp/#comment-826</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I personally believe that XMPP would be best suited. Mostly because several of the existing instant messaging service providers are exploring XMPP. It is said that Yahoo! is already moving  | toward XMPP.</p>

<p>When the world is fnaly but slowly moving toward one standard, it is stupid that Google should go against that.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Teredo for MacOS X</title>
            <dc:creator>vincent</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2007/02/21/miredo-osx/#comment-825</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Is there a plan to release an OS X package based on a more recent version of miredo any time soon? If I understand things correctly, your package is built against 1.0.6.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Stowaway</title>
            <dc:creator>darco</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2008/07/15/stowaway/#comment-824</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>No, we definitely could not keep the kitten, no matter how cute it was. </p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Stowaway</title>
            <dc:creator>puja</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2008/07/15/stowaway/#comment-822</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>come on thats a cute one and u can definately keep it</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: the MacOS X Keychain</title>
            <dc:creator>darco</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2006/01/01/macos-x-keychain/#comment-821</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Fixed. Thanks!</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 23:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: the MacOS X Keychain</title>
            <dc:creator>Alex W.</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2006/01/01/macos-x-keychain/#comment-820</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>This is an older thread, but a Google search brought me here when I was trying to figure out what encryption Keychain used.  I too assumed it was AES, but according to this site:</p>

<p><a href="http://static.agilewebsolutions.com/1password/user_guide/encryption.html">http://static.agilewebsolutions.com/1password/user_guide/encryption.html</a></p>

<p>it's Triple-DES.  Considering the source -- and that's it's a "statement against interest"(I'm sure they would rather claim it was AES) -- I'm inclined to think this is the correct answer.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 18:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Mobile XMPP</title>
            <dc:creator>darco</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2008/02/14/mobile-xmpp/#comment-813</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>@opjabber: IPv6 is a solution today. With technologies like 6to4 and Teredo, you can get IPv6 connectivity with zero cooperation of your network provider—assuming they don't block it outright (why would they?).</p>

<p>@Ernest, @Janne, and others: I have nothing against a binary encoding in principal as long as it is a one-to-one transform to and from the verbose XML, and is still able to handle new namespaces. If a binary encoding is flexible enough to handle that, then I don't have a problem with it—as long as the standard is open. For example, one such binary encoding happens to be a zlib-compressed XML stream. My biggest problem with Google's action is that they are not just changing the transport, they are changing the API. They could have an XMPP compliant API and just have a bizarre transport, but this isn't the direction they are apparently going.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Stowaway</title>
            <dc:creator>darco</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2008/07/15/stowaway/#comment-812</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I think our landlord would have a conniption.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: ybox2 Kits</title>
            <dc:creator>darco</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2008/06/03/ybox2-kits/#comment-811</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Fixed.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Stowaway</title>
            <dc:creator>RedLion</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2008/07/15/stowaway/#comment-810</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Come on, you can manage three.  He's too cute and gone through waaay to much to wind up in a shelter.</p>

<p>The GF and I have three cats.  Independence, aka Ol' Man, was a stray found on July 4th, 1991(?); Ozie, aka Fatty McFat, was a returned gift; Lance, aka Scout Kitty and Spy Kitty, was a shelter rescue/adoption.  All three are male.  We had a female, Liberty, aka Gurl Kitty, but she couldn't handle being around three males.  She wigged out completely by peeing on everything in the house and attacking everyone without provocation.  Errr...  Well, I guess the three boys mounting her 1000x per day can probably be classified as provocation.  We gave her to a friend and she's now fine.</p>

<p>Anyway, a third cat isn't much different than two.  Keep him!</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: ybox2 Kits</title>
            <dc:creator>RedLion</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2008/06/03/ybox2-kits/#comment-809</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>The requested URL /code/ybox2/trunk/docs/ybox2parts.pdf was not found on this server.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Stowaway</title>
            <dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2008/07/15/stowaway/#comment-808</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>that's so bizarre!</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Stowaway</title>
            <dc:creator>fireflysoup</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2008/07/15/stowaway/#comment-807</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>AWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: The Ring</title>
            <dc:creator>fireflysoup</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2008/04/02/the-ring/#comment-806</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>SO so so so so so so lovely!  What a beautiful couple you two are, and what a wonderful expression of the beauty you both shine on the world, as a synergistic team  <img src="http://www.deepdarc.com//images/smilies/1.png" alt=":)" style="border: 0; margin-bottom: -4px;" /> </p>

<p>I love the little heart on the side.. so sweet!</p>

<p>Love to you both </p>

<p>~ Jess</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 06:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: eMail via XMPP</title>
            <dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2006/03/30/email-via-xmpp/#comment-805</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting stuff.  I guess the reverse would be fairly easy.  Any suggestions on how to deal with forwards, bcc's, and emails as attachments?</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Jabber Bots</title>
            <dc:creator>foehammer</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2005/06/12/jabber-bots/#comment-804</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I too would love to see these open-sourced! I'd love to attempt to adapt one to run Automator actions to easier facilitate network/computer maintenance!</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: ybox2</title>
            <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/ybox2/#comment-803</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I just found the ybox2 on lady ada's site. It really looks fantastic. I can't wait to get my hands on it. It looks so hacker-friendly.
Keep up the good work.
Cheers,
Alex</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: darcness</title>
            <dc:creator>netra</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/darcness/#comment-802</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I will received a gratuite program of synfig animation 2D. Please is to Knew this aplication in design graphic and interior design.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 09:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
</channel>
</rss>
