<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="0.92"
        xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
        xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
        xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
        <title>deep darc » Comments</title>
        <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/</link>
        <description>deep and darc stuff</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:11:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
        <language>en</language>

                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Thoughts on Prius Acceleration</title>
            <dc:creator>darco</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2010/03/09/thoughts-on-prius-acceleration/#comment-939</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>The latest recall for faulty accelerators does not cover the 2003-2009 model Prius.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Thoughts on Prius Acceleration</title>
            <dc:creator>nadreck</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2010/03/09/thoughts-on-prius-acceleration/#comment-938</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>The faulty floor mats causing stuck accelerators are a separate recall that was initiated last year.  This is a new recall specifically about actually faulty accelerators.</p>

<p>Regarding the idiot who refused to put it in neutral: I think a lot of people don't realize that NEUTRAL isn't the same as PARK.  Which, again, is a case of user idiocy.  (I'm not saying everyone needs to know every mechanical element of their car, but they SHOULD at least learn what each gear setting actually does if they intend to ever drive a vehicle.)</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Thoughts on Prius Acceleration</title>
            <dc:creator>darco</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2010/03/09/thoughts-on-prius-acceleration/#comment-937</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Woz was describing a flaw while adjusting his cruise control on his 2010 Prius. He said himself that tapping the brake (a natural reaction to unintended acceleration) immediately disables cruise control and returns the car to normal operation. Not saying that it isn't a serious problem or that it doesn't need to be addressed and fixed (because it does), I'm just saying that it is likely a different issue entirely, and much less serious.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Thoughts on Prius Acceleration</title>
            <dc:creator>Michael Hoskins</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2010/03/09/thoughts-on-prius-acceleration/#comment-936</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Since the software in the Prius (and other affected Toyota vehicles) has been examined and no flaw has yet been found, it seems reasonable to assume many of these users are suffering from a floormat problem (Toyota issued a recall, you may want to check with your dealer).</p>

<p>But I remember reading a comment from Steve Wozniak regarding sudden acceleration, and how he was able to reproduce the problem repeatedly. </p>

<p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1430048&amp;cid=29973870">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1430048&amp;cid=29973870</a></p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Thoughts on Facebook Chat </title>
            <dc:creator>darco</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2010/02/15/thoughts-on-facebook-chat/#comment-935</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>@Juga: You are correct, I was just too lazy to point that out when I originally wrote the piece. I've just updated it to be more accurate.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Thoughts on Facebook Chat </title>
            <dc:creator>Juga Paazmaya</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2010/02/15/thoughts-on-facebook-chat/#comment-934</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Chat state notifications actually use the &lt;message&gt; stanza and it is possible to use it without the &lt;body&gt; tag. Thus the definition you list is partially off, but this does not change any of the facts related to the missing functionalities.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Thoughts on Facebook Chat </title>
            <dc:creator>Nÿco</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2010/02/15/thoughts-on-facebook-chat/#comment-932</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>When you add/remove friends or groups, you get roster pushes. Which is a quite cool, although normal, feature.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Thoughts on Facebook Chat </title>
            <dc:creator>Jeffrey Paul Zacher</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2010/02/15/thoughts-on-facebook-chat/#comment-931</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Looks like they are getting ready to implement the AOL client...should be more robust as the process moves forward...nice breakdown in your BLOG post.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: IPv6 Security and those damned dirty NATs</title>
            <dc:creator>darco</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2010/02/06/ipv6-security/#comment-930</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-928">@anonymous</a>: What you are describing is what the <a href="http://www.apple.com/airportextreme/">Apple Airport Extreme</a> base station does by default. This may well be what ends up becoming the de-facto standard for residential IPv6 routers. I dislike the idea because it usually requires the router to keep state, and that means that all connections will eventually 'die' after a period of inactivity. If you want to have a long-lived connection you will need to send keep-alives, which for wireless devices means significant battery life reduction. Not negating your point, just making an observation.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: IPv6 Security and those damned dirty NATs</title>
            <dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2010/02/06/ipv6-security/#comment-928</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>

<p>You can achieve the same security as with NAT with IPv6, setting your router properly. You can have your LAN set with global routable addresses but unreacheable from outside, and letting LAN clients to reach outside as if you were using NAT.</p>

<p>This is so simple, and I see no trouble nor needing to write lots of paragraphs inventing a problem.</p>

<p>Solution with ip6tables (for example), on the router:</p>

<p>(eth0 is lan leg, eth1 internet leg)</p>

<blockquote>
<pre>  *filter
  :INPUT DROP [1716:169212]
  -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
  -A INPUT -i eth0 -j ACCEPT
  -A INPUT -m state –state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
  -A INPUT -p icmpv6 –icmpv6-type echo-request -j ACCEPT
  :FORWARD DROP [3096:2128308]
  -A FORWARD -i eth0 -j ACCEPT
  -A FORWARD -m state –state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
  -A FORWARD -p icmpv6 –icmpv6-type echo-request -j ACCEPT
  :OUTPUT ACCEPT [1712:169536]
  COMMIT
</pre>
</blockquote>

<p>** the icmp echo request are the only that can reach inside your LAN for testing purpose. You can safely remove that lines to avoid this.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: XMPP Finally Arrives to Facebook</title>
            <dc:creator>darco</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2010/02/10/facebook-turns-on-xmpp-support/#comment-927</link>
            <description><![CDATA[

<p><a href="#comment-925">@M</a>: At this time, you will not be able to log in with a XMPP chat client unless you have given yourself a username.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Mobile XMPP</title>
            <dc:creator>darco</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2008/02/14/mobile-xmpp/#comment-926</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>@nigel: Google Talk actually uses XMPP. </p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: XMPP Finally Arrives to Facebook</title>
            <dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2010/02/10/facebook-turns-on-xmpp-support/#comment-925</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Will it be possible to log in using your user id (the string of numbers presented in the URL if you don't have a username). I'm not interested in a username.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Mobile XMPP</title>
            <dc:creator>Nigel Jones</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2008/02/14/mobile-xmpp/#comment-924</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. I'm just working through IM options for my linux-based Nokia N900</p>

<p>On wifi life is good, but on 3G keeping a data connection open for
 - SIP (for calls)
 - Skype (IM/calls)
 - gtalk
 - facebook (XMPP)</p>

<p>is wearing on the battery in a 3G area</p>

<p>I'm looking around as to which protocol is most efficient to decide which I can "afford" to keep on in 3G. Ideally that would be at least one. gtalk looks like an interesting option, but I prefer the "open standards" aspect of XMPP.</p>

<p>Of course my apple fan colleagues just tell me about apples' "push" service. of course in part that's down to lack of multitasking, but it's also very relevant in terms of power consumption.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: XMPP Personal Data Syncronization</title>
            <dc:creator>TabTwo</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2005/09/15/xmpp-personal-data-sync/#comment-922</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I like that idea.</p>

<p>One feature I'd like to see, I want to subscribe someones details. One can deside what the other is allowd to see an if the phonenumber changes, it syncs to my addressbook.</p>

<p>This could even grow to a distributed social network without the privacypains of facebook</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: XMPP Finally Arrives to Facebook</title>
            <dc:creator>Zsombor Szabó</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2010/02/10/facebook-turns-on-xmpp-support/#comment-921</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>And this: <a href="http://wiki.developers.facebook.com/index.php/Integrating_with_Facebook_Chat">http://wiki.developers.facebook.com/index.php/Integrating_with_Facebook_Chat</a></p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: XMPP Finally Arrives to Facebook</title>
            <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2010/02/10/facebook-turns-on-xmpp-support/#comment-920</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Read this: <a href="http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=297991732130">http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=297991732130</a></p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: XMPP Finally Arrives to Facebook</title>
            <dc:creator>Alexander Gnauck</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2010/02/10/facebook-turns-on-xmpp-support/#comment-919</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>normal usernames works as well. I am connected with alexander.gnauck which is my Facebook username.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: XMPP Finally Arrives to Facebook</title>
            <dc:creator>mike00</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2010/02/10/facebook-turns-on-xmpp-support/#comment-918</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>how do i connect securely?</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>RE: Teredo for MacOS X</title>
            <dc:creator>darco</dc:creator>
            <link>http://www.deepdarc.com/2007/02/21/miredo-osx/#comment-916</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>That means it is having trouble with the given teredo server. Try teredo.ipv6.microsoft.com instead. </p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
</channel>
</rss>
